Journal:
I chose the Journal
of Computer-Mediated Communication (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1083-6101),
which is
mainly about the social sciences with a focus on media technology and
communication with computers and the internet. It has an Impact Factor of 1.778
(and a five year impact factor of 4.748).
Article:
I chose the article: The Long-Term Effects of E-Advertising: The Influence of Internet
Pop-ups Viewed at a Low Level of Attention in Implicit Memory (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcc4.12035/abstract), which was published in the journal mentioned above
on October 7th, 2013. I chose it because of the last week’s theme
and the discussion of mass deception. This article shows the effects of commercials
and advertising on a large media platform, and therefore touches the subject of
manipulation and deception through media.
The main focus
of the article is to explore the effects of repeated brief exposure from
Internet commercials, i.e. pop-ups, and
what kind of impacts they have on a test subject 7 days after exposure and 3
months after exposure. Firstly they go through the theoretical framework of the
subject, how and why we react to short exposures of words and pictures. Then
they explain their methodology, how they’re conducting their experiments, and
also their own hypotheses. Lastly they conclude their results of the experiment
in a discussion and a conclusion where they point out that short-term, low
attention exposure can have long-term effects.
In general I
thought their research to be pretty concise and to the point. They linked their
background and theory, which I considered to be relevant and logical, to the construction
of methodology, and could draw somewhat conclusive results from their
experiments.
- Briefly
explain to a first year student what theory is, and what theory is not.
Theory is
something that has been widely discussed throughout time and many have tried to
put a real definition to the word. But since the subjects in which theories can
be made differ so much, definitions of the word become elusive. But, to
simplify, a theory is something observed, a way to describe, explain or help to
understand a phenomenon. In Stutton and Staw’s paper, What Theory is Not, they explain theory as not being the actual
data, references, hypotheses, variables or diagrams, but it is something that
can (and perhaps should) make use of these.
- Describe the major theory
or theories that are used in your selected paper. Which theory type (see
Table 2 in Gregor) can the theory or theories be characterized as?
The article I chose I’d say is mainly the second type of theory described
in Gregor’s text: Explanatory. It
takes an existing phenomenon, describes it and tests the effects of it, to try
to explain why and what kind of effects the phenomenon actually has. It does
have some influences of the third type of theory: Prediction, in the sense that it provides some suggestions for
further research, and that those predictions are more speculative than actually
based on research.
- Which are the benefits
and limitations of using the selected theory or theories?
The benefits of choosing the explanatory theory is that it provides a way
of understanding and showing others the world as it is from a certain point of
view. As it is mention in Gregor’s text: it can be label as a theory for understanding.
This type of theory should however not be used to make deterministic prediction.
One has to be aware that these kinds of theories often include a high level of generalization,
which can also be seen in the article I chose. They couldn’t test every
individual exposed to Internet commercials, every type of commercial, within every
time range one is exposed/not exposed to the commercial, and so on. They had to
generalize to make any conclusions at all, which means that here is always has
to be a certain level of probability, causality and consistency taken into
account when viewing the conclusions.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar